🔗 Share this article

Loved ones of people laid to rest in graves at risk from coastal erosion state that indecision on how best to tackle the issue is causing them unnecessary distress about the final resting places of their departed family.

An Impending Threat to Historic Churchyards

The council have identified three burial grounds in the villages of Happisburgh, Trimingham, and Mundesley as being in danger of being swallowed by the sea in the next few generations.

A newly published study on the issue details a range of options, from doing nothing to disinterring bodies and relocating them in more secure locations. Officials say it is for local people to determine how to move forward.

“At the moment we’re in limbo. It causes me distress. They wanted this to serve as their last home, but it isn’t going to be because of the encroaching sea.”

Projections indicate at least part of one churchyard could be claimed by the waves in the next 80 years, but some locals fear it will happen much sooner. “I think it’s got under 20 years, if you consider what’s happened in the last 30 years,” a farmer stated.

Haunted by the Ghosts of Eccles

One resident recalled a childhood visit to the neighbouring settlement of Eccles, which has largely disappeared into the water, along with its place of worship and burial ground.

“It was possible to see human remains,” she said. “Some have this romantic idea that the deceased will just get washed out to the ocean. That is not the case. People will collect remains as souvenirs and go plundering graves in search of treasures. That is completely undignified.”

“I’m worried that the same thing that befell at Eccles will happen here and there’ll be bones on the shore. I’d be appalled by that.”

A Soldier's Grave in Jeopardy

Along the coast lies the burial plot of a ex-soldier killed while serving abroad. His parent expressed she lost sleep after discovering her son’s grave might one day be moved.

“It does disturb me to think this may not remain his permanent home,” she said. “For us it’s an significant site to visit.”

In her view, new burials should stop but says it is premature to exhume current plots. “What I would choose for now is to do nothing and watch carefully, but an timely resolution must be made when a critical moment has been reached.”

Searching for Solutions and Certainty

The lack of consensus over the timing and method to handle the challenge has resulted in bereaved families feeling frustrated and anxious.

Several families are calling for additional coastal protections to delay the inevitable erosion and to allow burials to proceed for now. Different voices argue the time for moving graves is approaching.

“The situation is very emotive,” a family member stated. “The council’s report was thorough, but now there’s uncertainty about how it is taken forward. And everybody is avoiding responsibility over who is responsible.”

A local official confirmed the burial sites were under the care of the local diocese. “Ultimately it is up to them to decide the path to take. Our role is here to assist them through that process with residents.”

It was also stated there was ample time to consider all the options. “We are talking decades before it begins getting lost.”

“Currently, there exists no unified opinion on what should be done yet. It requires good community discussions to discover the appropriate solutions for each community.”

The prospect of the loss of the churches and graveyards was described as one of “profound sorrow for the area,” but church representatives also spoke of a doctrine in resurrection, providing a theological perspective on the physical disappearance of sacred ground.