🔗 Share this article

Mainstream political parties are increasingly allowing the far right to set the political agenda, as per a new study conducted in the Federal Republic of Germany.

Researchers discovered that this phenomenon has inadvertently benefited far-right groups by validating their viewpoints and spreading them more widely.

Analysis Based on Two Decades of News Coverage

The results, released in the academic journal on political studies, utilized an computerized content review of more than 520,000 news pieces from six German publications.

Berlin-based researchers observed that as the radical faction moved from fringe issues in the 1990s era to core themes like integration and migration, mainstream political groups increasingly adjusted their communication in response.

This adaptation boosted the dissemination of these concepts and indicated to the electorate that such stances were legitimate.

Consequences for Democracy

"Public communication by established parties plays a central role in the electoral success of the radical right," stated a expert in political behavior involved in the research.

"This factor has been underestimated," she added.

The effect was evident even when mainstream parties were condemning the far right. "They still receive focus," the expert commented. "The main point is that because we live in such a struggle for visibility, this focus is key."

Mainstreaming Phenomenon Throughout Europe

While the study was focused on Germany, this mainstreaming phenomenon is probable to affect nations throughout the European continent.

"This is frequently observed in European media," explained another researcher. "Radical groups makes a statement and everybody begins discussing it for several days."

"Although you're countering it, you're repeating it," he stated.

Hardening of Public Rhetoric

At times, leaders have also toughened their language to align with that of the far right.

In a recently published interview, a then national leader advocated widespread expulsions and pushed for them to happen "more often and faster."

Comparable examples can be found across Europe, as elected officials from countries ranging from the UK to France embrace the rhetoric of the radical right, especially on migration.

This has created an feedback loop that would have been unthinkable a decade ago.

Central Problem: Who Dictates the Agenda?

"{If you're a centrist political group and you are discussing cultural issues – migration, integration – in a way that is determined by the pace of the radical right, that's the whole idea of narrative control," explained a study author.

Other political parties have taken additional measures, attempting to emulate the hardline platform of the radical right, despite research suggests that doing so leads voters to cast their ballot for the far right.

Progressive Impact and Public Perception

The scope of data gathered showed that the impact of radical groups had been progressive and had grown over time.

"Public perception doesn't change from one day to another," commented a researcher. "However, when you hear this pessimistic narrative around migration frequently, and it is being spread not only by radical groups but also, for instance, by established parties, then of course this narrative travels further."

Need for Mainstream Groups to Carve Out Their Distinct Discourses

The study highlighted the necessity for mainstream parties to carve out their distinct discourses, especially on topics such as migration and integration, rather than continuously trailing after the radical right.

"It's like a dance," said one author. "If the conductor is radical and you're reacting to it, you lose the ability to choose which music should be heard."